What the Ban on Campaign Finance Is about
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is why so many people have been eagerly waiting for this ruling on whether corporates will be allowed to contribute in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. It is evident that nonprofit as well as charity organizations are not allowed to finance any of these political campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.
Cited reference: websites